Shabbat Shalom and Happy New Year. The parsha for this week is Vayigash, the story of how the House of Israel actually came to live in Egypt. This is a particularly interesting episode in the Torah because it is one of the most overtly literary moments in the Five Books. It is full of drama, symbolism and most of all foreshadowing.
This parsha starts in the middle of a chapter. Judah entreats Joseph to reconsider his decision to take Benjamin, Joseph's youngest brother, as a bondsman after framing him for theft. Joseph chooses to finally end his ruse and reveal his true identity to his brothers. When they come before him to beg for the release of Benjamin, Joseph tells them who he is. He also tells them that he harbors them no ill will, saying that it was God who sent him to Egypt, not his brothers.
Here we have an interesting opportunity for a philosophical discussion. This entire parsha sits at the fulcrum of many events, past and future, that indistinguishably mix the good with the bad. There is an inexplicable sense of cause and effect. Joseph is betrayed by his brothers and languishes in slavery, but had he not he would never have risen to his position of authority in Egypt. By the same turn, had Joseph not come to Egypt the pharaoh wouldn't have been prepared for the seven years of famine and the entire empire would have starved, including Joseph's family in Canaan. Like dominoes, events keep triggering new events.
After Joseph reveals himself to his brothers, he invites his entire family to come to Egypt from Canaan. This includes dozens of people, essentially an entire clan and the seeds of a nation. Of course, had Joseph not invited his family to live in Egypt, the Israelites would never have become slaves to Ramses, and therefore never would have been freed by God and led to the Torah.
The story of Joseph is the story of the Jewish people in microcosm- To go from comfort to slavery, then from slavery to humble exaltation. The parallel events in both stories are convoluted. The bad directly results in the good, with the good paving the way to the bad. The question we must ask ourselves is, how do we approach life when this dynamic is ever-present?
Everyone experiences their share of good times and tragedies. Our relationships with one another are complex and the longer we know one another the more likely we are to retain some kind of emotional "baggage" that further complicates how we feel and how we act. The stories of Joseph and then of the Israelites are stories of the human condition. Not only are we bound to experience ups and downs, we are also generally incapable of seeing what good or bad things will result from the conditions of the present. It is exceedingly easy to simply remind people to have faith that good will grow from the bad. As the parsha says, God went with the Israelites when they went to Egypt. But as we discussed last week, "going with God" does not guarantee happiness.
The best insight we can gather from this parsha is that, in all of this complicated business with the mixing of good and bad, there are still moments of volition. Joseph chooses to re-embrace his family. God does not command it of him, neither does etiquette. In the midst of all this confusion, Joseph listens to his emotions and makes a decision in his life to welcome some goodness into the present. We small humans will spend most of our lives getting tossed around by past, present and future bouts of good and bad. What makes our lives meaningful are those rare opportunities for choice.